The important thing to remember when gathering evidence is that the more evidence the better - that is, the more evidence you gather to demonstrate your skills, the more confident an assessor can be that you have learned the skills not just at one point in time, but are continuing to apply and develop those skills (as opposed to just learning for the test!). Furthermore, one piece of evidence that you collect will not usualy demonstrate all the required criteria for a unit of competency, whereas multiple overlapping pieces of evidence will usually do the trick!
From the Wiki University
What evidence can you provide to prove your understanding of each of the following citeria?
Analyse design objectives
|
|
Applicable Occupational Health and Safety (OHS), environmental, legislative and organisational requirements relevant to assessing product feasibility of designs are identified and followed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Designpurpose is assessed and the potential market for the product investigated Completed |
Evidence:
|
Intended production materials and production processes are analysed as the basis for development Completed |
Evidence:
|
Communication with others is established and maintained in line with OHS requirements Completed |
Evidence:
|
Set the design assessment criteria
|
|
Criteria for the assessment of production material options are established Completed |
Evidence:
|
Criteria for the assessment of product functionality are established Completed |
Evidence:
|
Criteria for the assessment of production process options are established and impact of these on overall business operations assessed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Criteria for the assessment of safety and potential liability issues are established Completed |
Evidence:
|
Criteria for assessment of costs and marketability are established Completed |
Evidence:
|
Apply the assessment criteria
|
|
Resources including human, material, equipment and systems are allocated to particular design grading criteria processes Completed |
Evidence:
|
Products which are competitors or potential competitors in the market place are selected for comparative purposes Completed |
Evidence:
|
Design is scored and graded against agreed criteria and results recorded Completed |
Evidence:
|
Competition products are scored and graded against agreed criteria and results recorded Completed |
Evidence:
|
Assessment results are completed in line with the agreed process Completed |
Evidence:
|
Establish feasibility and options
|
|
Assessment results of the design and competition products are analysed Completed |
Evidence:
|
Designs which fail to satisfy assessment and provide no optional potential are rejected Completed |
Evidence:
|
Designs which fail to satisfy assessment and have optional or alternative potential are referred to appropriatepersonnel Completed |
Evidence:
|
Designs which satisfy potential are conditionally endorsed and conditions recorded and passed to the appropriate personnel Completed |
Evidence:
|
Formal recordsandreports are completed and processed in line with organisational procedures Completed |
Evidence:
|